Board Thread:MHX General Discussion/@comment-4969421-20151109154146/@comment-5178018-20151111192307

Akidra wrote: It's funny how you say ignored the second half of my statement, considering that the word vector has at least 3 meanings, all of which I've referenced...   [Pretty much pointless rambling here]   ...By the way, assertion = flaw, so checkmate.

Unless of course you're as sick of your arbitrary rules as I am by now. Quite clearly you don't know how optical illusions work. They don't have to be done intentionally for the illusion to take effect, they can be created by as simple a means as a piece of paper. You also don't have the capability of creating an argument worth my time to read over, but by how many times you edit it I'd guess... "angry", "I'm not wrong, just a hypocrite" and "Here's obligatory rambling to make myself sound more correct than you", yes?

And honestly, who calls checkmate as a last resort for trying to end an argument? If you want to try getting psychological with me then bring it somewhere else so nobody else has to deal with your useless walls of text. You're claiming correction and absolution on a matter of speculation, so you're clearly throwing a tantrum. I initially stated that I disagree- actually, not even, I say that I still find my own theories much more plausible and what becomes of that? Yes, you turn it into an argument that you can hardly even handle, because you're the one who acted with close mindedness.

The difference between us is that I accept that I'm not right, nor am I wrong. My "arbitrary rules" simply dictates "everybody is wrong in their own right". If you can't handle such basic ideas on a SPECULATION THREAD, I'd advise you make your way out before you embarrass yourself further.