Board Thread:MHX General Discussion/@comment-24734669-20151125221339/@comment-26261665-20151128154506

Kaiser G.Saw wrote: TheLooker45 wrote: Kaiser G.Saw wrote: TheLooker45 wrote: ^I had read what you said. '''"Any traditions need to be keept besides Los and Ian in every game". '''You said that automaticaly makes that the final boss can be old. So you are saying that ONLY ONE needs to be kept. That is a nonsense since you can´t know if they are only keeping one of the traditions instead of two of them. It was an afirmation. "Capcom doesnt stick with a set Formular of traditions that needs to be keept besides Los and Ian in every game."

huh.. either my english realy- realy- totaly s**ks or you should pay attention to a whole sentence.. I´m paying attention to the whole sentence.Unless i´m the one with the bad English (which is a possibility) ,you are saying that except Ian an Los being in all games they don´t need to keep any other traditions. Then I ask again,how do you know that? You can´t know they are keeping one tradition and not the other too. how do i speculate that? reasons are stated way above this now. Stuff like Teo without Luna as another example. So are we good now? I still don´t get the phrase. What were you saying then when you said that? I know what examples you gave before,it is just that I understood that you were saying they only need to keep Rath´s traditions,and that wasn´t speculation,that was an afirmation.