User blog comment:BannedLagiacrus/Monster Appreciation Week: Leshen and Ancient Leshen/@comment-4370375-20190830190153/@comment-4969421-20190831212242

>You yell at me for supposedly latching unto the toxicity argument without any proof or reason while showing the exact type of attitude I'm calling out. Literally all you have done is show why I shouldn't try to reason with the unreasonable

Excuse me? How are we being unreasonable, exactly? You bring up points and then people try to refute them. This is called a debate. You keep bringing up toxicity when in reality nothing is there. No one in this thread has been, at any point, anything less than civil. I see now you're just itching to pull the victim card out of your sleeve, so I'm gonna go ahead and quit at this point. It's clear the thing isn't going anywhere. You won't change your position and you've failed to convince me about forced mutliplayer being a good thing.

>Just because there are legit reasons for wanting to play alone doesn't mean the "everyone except yourself is a shit player out to ruin your hunt" mindset doesn't exist nor does it give you an excuse to dog-pile on someone for pointing out its existence.

And those reasons are still as valid as any other. You disliking them doesn't make a difference.

>Three multiplayer requisite monsters are more than acceptable for most players, myself included.

Speak for yourself. Judging from this MAW, most people do not enjoy these kind of quests, and do not find them acceptable whatsoever.

>Full game requires PlayStation®Plus membership to access online multiplayer Right on the PlayStation store page.

Ok, now show me where does it say an internet connection is needed to play the game, like MMOs and multiplayer games are required to do.

>Underwater combat and swimming says hello.

The removal of underwater was a mistake just like forced mutliplayer is. My first post in this thread was sarcasm, by the way. An older game making mistakes doesn't mean a newer game making mistakes or failing to fix the previous ones is okay.

>Let me ask you something: If Monster Hunter was a single player game rather than a cooperative multiplayer, what is the financial incentive to not have actual loot boxes in it? Yes there is a legal incentive but that only came after there was enough of an outcry against it and companies are already trying to find ways around it.

So according to you, it's either lootboxes or forced multiplayer? I don't even know where to begin to explain just how utterly stupid that statement is. Perhaps you should look at any of the "bs-free" single player games available in the market atm? No lootboxes, no microtransactions, etc. It shouldn't take you long, because there are plenty.