Board Thread:MH Wikia Suggestions/@comment-26144482-20150315180738

long story short:

There were some choice words--nothing crazy between myself and another user who said something subjectively offensive. I responded a bit defensively, but again--nothing crazy. I called the guy a "condescending prick for implying I wasn't a good player because I couldn't avoid an "easy attack," in response to me reporting a certain monster's attack is overpowered.

Anyhow, the rest of the chatroom participants then proceeded to put me on trial asking why I made that comment. I defended myself and even apologized for my rash response, since I did recognize the nature of my response was unwarranted after all. All the while, SgtSnowHaze is continually calling me a "fagit" and then I get banned. Yet SgtSnowHaze's behavior is condoned, and is even arguably more offensive? That is completely inequitable. I don't care if I remain banned but if Gob the Najarala banned me after apologizing and tacitly endorses SgtSnowHaze's behavior of calling me a "fagit" repeatedly, by omitting to correct that completely unwarranted hostility (vs my defensive hostility) then that's a complete abuse of rights and I strongly urge you to reconsider his position since he is doling justice vigilante style, when he's offended, instead of with an equitable measure, across the board.

I don't know if you care if your administrators are selectively enforcing the rules with some users but not their friends...but if you do, you might want to know that. I think it's pretty tragic that you have such biased individuals in positions of power. Power does corrupt after all!

Whatever the outcome--happy hunting to the rest of you decent people on this wikia. 