User blog comment:BannedLagiacrus/Monster Hunter Ecological and Lore Info Blog/@comment-2123858-20160512042625

Just something really quick I would like to point out, I remember reading somewhere in MHFU that Fatalis had been labeled in the game as the largest dragon capable of flight. I could be wrong, I haven't checked in a while, it may have been a description for one of it's ecology videos, library entries, or quests, but I am fairly certain it was important because Black Fatalis's Ecology video was called "Legend of Flight." It would make sense due to the weight/lift ratio for flight would be reaching it's believable limits at what would be possible for nature to preduce that would defy gravity while being able to function properly for it's size (despite having weakened/bizzare gravity and being fantasy-esc universe). Then comes in Gogmazios, which easily outsizes the Fatalis Trio in-game, kinda feels like a contradiction. Maybe the games contain information on monsters relative to the region and a certain place in time, thus limiting the knowledge the guild has in each game. To explain a bit in short, maybe each game is actually seperated by a certain span of time and shows the gradual evolution of the guild as the knowledge of monsters expands over time, for example, in the first two generations, each game builds upon the knowledge of the guild and discovers the monsters of local regions that have recently been under the guild's care. Maybe third gen had a seperate guild, which might have been the reason that the knowledge of monsters were very limited compared to the knowledge in second gen, which became aware of the other regions and creatures (as well as the guild that discovered them) in fourth gen. Anyway the real explanation is that the designers only wrote entries for the creatures they programed into the game, but it's still curious to me.

Is there anything I am not aware of or overlooked when writing this? I am I completely wrong or is there really a contradition? I know I didn't fully flesh it out, but what did you think about the guild theory-ish thing?