FANDOM

Chimera-gui

0 Discussion posts
  • I was born on March 19
A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hello! We have an awesome partnership with Capcom for Pax East 2020. We have reserved slots for our active wiki editors at "Monster Hunter Festa" Saturday February 29th. If you plan on attending Pax please let me know. We'd love to hold a spot for you! You can email me directly at editor_rewards@fandom.com or hit me on Discord HeyTots#1127

      Loading editor
  • What's the point in bringing back the old appearance infobox?

      Loading editor
    • There doesn't seem to be a consensus regarding how Game Appearances are going to be formatted and the template was updated to included Iceborne.

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, consensus. There is probably more consensus about whether the current monster of the week is a good addition to the series than for any wiki-content-related issue.

      However, the general direction seems to be that the wiki needs to improve its appearance and structure, and be more accessible. The main disadvantages of the template are:

      • On mobile, the small game logos are even smaller and have different widths causing the game names to be horizontally misaligned.
      • On desktop, three separate show/hide sections (with a high chance of the collapsed content being the single bolded word "none") are rather user-unfriendly.
      • Also on desktop, the 100% width makes it clash with the real monster infobox if the previous article sections aren't long enough to push the appearances below infobox, resulting in huge empty spaces on those pages. e.g. Furious Rajang#Habitat
        Loading editor
    • Fair enough, reverted back to the lists.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm not really sure what to say here, other than those weren't visible when I was fixing it up before. That's why I put them there, cause I couldn't see them.

    Oh well. They're there now regardless, so whatever I got to say doesn't really matter. But there's a little explanation regardless.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I didn't use the "classic" wikitext table for the MHWI menu template because they look weird/are too large on mobile or don't show up at all.

      Loading editor
  • Hey! 

    I'm Garrett and I'm a community manager here at Fandom.
    The Gaming community team at Fandom would like to reward users like you who have really made extraordinary contributions to our platform. 
    To do that I'll need to email you directly to talk details. 
    Is it ok with you if we contact you at the email address you have listed on file for your account?

      Loading editor
  • For the Tigrex page, why was the Roar of Cards artwork removed and the Iceborne render moved from being a render from the page to being the new promotional artwork in the infobox?

      Loading editor
    • Kogath wrote:
      We appreciate the offer but the old way added unnecessary images which clogged up the page, ESPECIALLY in mobile view. Right now our Wiki has some of the WORST mobile ready pages.

      From the following thread: here

        Loading editor
    • Chimera-gui wrote:
      Kogath wrote:
      We appreciate the offer but the old way added unnecessary images which clogged up the page, ESPECIALLY in mobile view. Right now our Wiki has some of the WORST mobile ready pages.
      From the following thread: here

      Aight.

      Well, can we do the same for practically every other non-World monster page? While the Tigrex page got changed, other pages (like the Nargacuga page) stayed the same.

        Loading editor
    • You may want to talk to Kogath about that.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I want you to ask to stop rerolling the Leshen article to your version. As far as I am aware, there is no such rule regarding monster articles, that they HAVE to be written purely in singular. Even on this very wiki articles like Rathalos, Diablos and Monoblos are purely written in plural. And some articles are written with sections in both forms. If you have any proof of such a rule, please provide a source. Also, even if such a rule exists, the grammar on some sentences is faulty, so please don't just roll back everything to your version, because it still contains minor errors.

    This doesn't have to become an edit-war.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Where did you get that anyway if you don't mind me asking?

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.